31 May 2011

My Favourite Bruckner Recordings (episode 7b) -- Not-my-favourite diversions

The pun in the title is not entirely intended, but it nevertheless reflects some truth in it. Talking about these 5 'unique' recordings is a diversion from the original topic of my favourite Bruckner recordings. On the other hand, some of these CDs can become something that amuses me when I feel like listening to them.

Let's go through the 'unique' discs listed in episode 7a one by one.


This live recording was made in 1977 when the Radio-Symphonie-Orchester Berlin was in that seven-year 'dark' period of not having a single principal conductor.  The immaculate ensemble cultured by Ferenc Fricsay in the fifties and early sixties was unfortunately nowhere to be found in this performance, although it was not bad. Richter gave us one of the slowest first movements of Symphony No. 4 at 22'13". To get an idea of how slow it is, it is even slower than Celibidache's on EMI (21'56") and three minutes longer than Wand's with the Berlin Philharmonic (19'11"). Fortunately Richter could usually maintain a long line in this symphony. The second movement was taken as the andante it was intended to be, but the Scherzo was too broad to my taste, even verging on sluggishness. Abbado and the Lucerne Festival Orchestra were definitely more delectable with its pretty exuberance here. The Finale glided along with a tempo rather disproportionate to the slow tempo of the first movement.



Gerhard Pflüger's was the Principal Conductor and Artistic Director of the Leipzig Radio Symphony Orchestra from 1949 to 1957. This Bruckner Fifth CD was based on a Urania LP issued soon after the recording was made in 1952. The sound of this CD has a limited dynamic range with quite a significant cutoff in the treble and bass. As a result, the chorale in the Finale becomes underwhelming. The reading is quite orthodox without much personal characterization.



Bongartz's Bruckner 6th enjoyed almost a cult status among some fans, of course with some good reasons.

Without doubt, he gave us a very beautiful Adagio. Here, the music is almost enlivened into a living creature because it can weep and lament (what wonderful oboe playing!) in the first theme, sing in the second and dance and run in the third. It is also endowed with a regular steady pulse, a key attribute of Bongartz. I've more than once in the past played this Adagio alone to my intense enjoyment. If the Adagio is so good why doesn't this recording become one of your favourites, I can almost hear you ask? The problem is you have to go through the inhospitable tempestuous terrain in the first movement before you can arrive at the oasis of the Adagio. The terrain may be inhospitable to me but it has proved to be heaven for others. The first brass outburst, yes outburst, in the first movement is frightening and indeed startling. If it happens once, I may still call it special effect to enhance the excitement, but if it recurs and recurs later in the movement, I can only take it as hysterical, especially after I've listened to the 'normal', beautifully played movement that follows. Bruckner is not a temperamental person after all, is he? Furthermore, compared to the mellow sound Blomstedt honed from this orchestra, you can never tell it was the same Gewandhausorchester Leipzig.

If you relish such exciting bombardment in Bruckner Sixth, you've found the right record. You need not look further.



Muhai Tang may be the only Chinese conductor to have recorded a Bruckner symphony. He could maintain a nice long line in this symphony. The cello theme in the opening movement is very lyrical and the third theme beautiful. Perhaps in an attempt to sustain legato throughout, he did not allow adequate space between phrases in the development section. The coda is glorious however. The Adagio has its moving moments despite the feeling that he sounded a little hurried here. The orchestra, its good ensemble notwithstanding, is light on bass and this weakness is more the apparent in the Adagio. The remaining two movements are eloquent enough. I'd say this reading is unexpectedly good and in particular lyricism shines through. Although I didn't include it as one of my favourites, I enjoyed it very much.



It is a special recording. It would not be overstating to say that Delman is an iconoclast in Bruckner. His approach to Bruckner is beyond what one is used to in the many recordings that come before or after his.

In the first movement, the opening is muted, with the string tremolo almost inaudible. The brass playing is acceptable, but just here. In the second thematic group where usually the strings carry the melodic line, Delman changed the emphasis constantly, sometimes to the woodwinds, sometimes to the lower strings and then to the horns. He went on to exert much personal rubato in the third thematic group. His tempo is quite slow in this movement but you don't really feel it this way, because your attention is diverted to different sections of the orchestra he highlighted as the music unfolds. The Scherzo shows the limitation of the orchestra and the ensemble barely keeps itself together in the slower pulse, losing much of the urgency expected. There is no doubt that Delman was much engrossed by the music as he was almost singing along with the orchestra in the Adagio. However he was let down by the inadequate strings, especially the cellos which are so important in this great movement, and the unsteady pulse. It is surely a recording that will satisfy my curiosity rather than my taste. Maybe I'm too stupid because I still struggle to understand the message Delman wanted to tell us even after listening to the disc a couple of times.
  

25 May 2011

My Favourite Bruckner Recordings (episode 7a) -- Rarity is not a criterion

It doesn't require the sharp mind of Sherlock Holmes to diagnose self-aggrandizement in the classical music world, from players on stage to listeners at home next to a pair of speakers. Nor, indeed, does it need an insightful mind to see that rarity has often been equated with supremacy in recorded classical music. Hard-to-find records have been hailed as treasures unable to be appreciated by the Tom, Dick and Harry in music lovers -- these rare finds are hors concours recognised only by the connoisseur. That's nothing wrong with someone enjoying his/her rare gems. However, as usual, life is not so simple. Problem arises when these 'knowledgeable' persons assume that all-too-familiar condescending attitude towards their poorer fellow listeners who cling to their common and popular records.

How familiar it is to hear " You like Wand and Karajan right? Oh yeah you people usually do. Have you ever heard of so-and-so?" Popular choices are considered low taste, and the same applies to modern recordings compared to old ones. Just as the premise that everything old is good in classical music recordings is based on the skimpiest of underpinnings, not everything rare, or simply just hard-to-find, must be good either. I'll take five examples to illustrate this point. These 5 conductors each have only one extant Bruckner symphony recording up to this moment. Aside from one record, by Heinz Bongartz, which is still available only in a box-set of 8 CDs in some areas, and another, by Karl Richter, which is available only in Japan, all the rest are out of print at this moment. Most of these recordings have been eulogised as the 'best' in the respective symphony somewhere over the internet. My purpose of commenting on these 'unique' recordings is not to taunt those immensely satisfied listeners, far from it, but just to present a different view to balance the picture.

These 5 CDs are:
1) Symphony No. 4: Karl Richter, Radio-Symphonie-Orchestra Berlin, live 7 Nov 1977 (Altus ALT068)
2) Symphony No. 5: Gerhard Pflüger, Leipzig Philharmonic Orchestra, 3&4 Apr 1952 (Dante LYS 417)
3) Symphony No. 6: Heinz Bongartz, Gewandhausorchester Leipzig, Dec 1964 (Berlin Classics 0184512BC)
4) Symphony No. 7: Tang Muhai (湯沐海), Queensland Symphony Orchestra, 22&23 Nov 1996 (ABC Classics CD 456 664-2)
5) Symphony No. 9: Vladimir Delman, Orchestra Sinfonica dell'Emilia Romagna "Arturo Toscanini", Apr 1994 (Aura AUR 425-2)

A mixed bag, I'd say. But a very interesting mixed bag, I have to add. Although none of these CDs make it to my favourite list, they are entertaining in their unique ways. Picture scans and comments later.
 

21 May 2011

My Favourite Bruckner Recordings (episode 6) -- What are my criteria?

One of my friends asked me yesterday, rather bluntly but with no malice. "Why did it take so long for you to post your favourite Bruckner recordings? It's not difficult to just give me a list?" I was a little taken aback. My frank answer is, "I'm too fastidious."

Yes, I'm a fastidious person, particularly in classical music. Maybe that's why I like Bruckner's music so much, as I suppose he was also fastidious. When I decided to compile a list of my favourite Bruckner recordings, I prepared seven flash cards, each dedicated to one symphony, from No. 3 to No. 9. I just jotted down my choices off hand. Then I went to my CD shelf and briefly browsed through my collection to see if I'd left out some which did not come to mind in the first place. I understand that some will say those which do not come to mind in the first place should be no good. There must be some truth in this statement, but I reckon that I don't have an elephantine memory and I have quite a lot of Bruckner CDs, so this sort of reminder is necessary for me, especially when I'm preparing a list of many and not a single favourite for each symphony.

Then I had to take out all the CDs in my draft list and listened to all of them once again to see if the impressions in my memory are still valid. With so many new additions in the past ten years, some old warhorses are bound to come up to great competition. So it takes time. Too short a list may just be too biased and oversimplify things unnecessarily. Too long a list will render it useless. However there is no magic number. My initial decision is around 6 for each symphony and if possible list at least one for each version in one symphony (but the total number for each symphony is still around 6). After that I had to scan the covers or take pictures of the CDs.

A big question is: what are my criteria for my favourites? It goes without saying that personal tastes are very subjective, and can be quite different from objective judgement. Some would say why not prepare two lists, one subjective and one objective. I don't agree because I believe that separating objective and subjective choices is too artificial. We live in a world when we base our actions or decisions on both objective and subjective factors; we just cannot segregate them meaningfully. Either way it is biased. When music appreciation is a personal experience, there is no true objectivity in the strictest sense. It also applies to other forms of art. It makes me task no less easier as I have to find the right balance between objective judgement and subjective personal taste, as they are intertwined.

I hope I can make good use of the weekend to post my favourites for Symphony No. 3 shortly.