15 September 2009

Review of Paavo Järvi's Bruckner Seventh -- enthusiasm rejuvenated

When my friend asked me to review a new Bruckner 7th recording recently, I had a moment of hesitation. The disadvantage of listening to countless recorded versions of the same symphony is that one can become numb to the piece and also infected with the proverbial familiarity breeding contempt. The other side of the coin is that only the extraordinary will stand out and get the attention of the tired and wearied judge in the audition.


I make no excuse to the fact that music appreciation and enjoyment is a very subjective thing however much objective element is involved. So with the exception of my old favourites (Furtwängler’s, Wand’s BPO, Karajan’s last with VPO, Giulini’s, Celibidache’s 1971 with Stuttgart RSO, etc), only 2 discs come to mind at this moment as “special” in the last few years’ of listening. One is the eloquent and light-weight Philippe Herreweghe’s (Harmonia Mundi), and the other is the delectable and beautiful reading by Kurt Sanderling with the SWR RSO (Hänssler).


Paavo Järvi is a new Brucknerian, at least as far as recording goes. I remember many years ago when he came to guest-conduct the Hong Kong Philharmonic Orchestra on Estonian pieces by Arvo Pärt and Erkki-Sven Tüür, we had a brief interview with him in a hotel café one evening. He was charismatic and polite. When we asked him whether he would conduct Bruckner’s symphonies, he frankly answered that it was not yet time but he would consider it later. Now the time comes. Heading an orchestra with a Bruckner tradition so to speak (Inbal has recorded a cycle pioneering some early versions with this orchestra), he is now planning to record all Bruckner symphonies. Let’s see how his first installment fares.


His reading is a very romantic one. The orchestral sonority is excellent, with mesmerizing woodwinds, beautiful horns (so important in Bruckner’s symphonic world), and pleasing cavernous basses. One can say that the basses are not deep enough as compared with the Munich or Berlin Philharmonic, but one is really carping here. The recording has a nice warm acoustics with much space and “air” around each instrument, particularly the woodwinds.


I was stunned by my own reaction to the opening cello melody: I was moved, a feeling that eluded me for so many instances in my past contact with this symphony, both live and recorded. The flow of the music just carried you along. Note how well he makes the ritardando in the transition into the coda, which starts at 18’18 (bar 391, letter W) with the drum roll before the violas and cellos join in one bar later (but at 18’26) repeating the opening melody. And what a beautiful coda.


In the Adagio, note how graceful he moulds the second theme (starting 4’22, bar 37, letter D), and the heavenly flute playing in the second part of the second theme (5’25-5’50, bars 53-59, starting letter F). The cymbal crash, triangle roll, and tympani are there at the climax (17’24, bar 177, letter W), but the build up to this climax is a deft point he makes. Again his hands are gentle in the transition into the coda (18’09) where the flute plays to the pizzicato of the violins before the coda starts at 18’26 (bar 185, letter X). These transitions are important, at least to me, in joining blocks of sounds in Bruckner’s musical architecture, without which the whole building will just fall apart.


The scherzo is animated. The Trio (starting 3’33) is simply beautiful with very nice string legato. It is a lively finale, with exquisite woodwind playing. He plays a good conclusion to the whole symphony. The good thing about his reading is that although it sounds and feels very romantic, it never appears over-indulgent.


It is an excellent start to his planned cycle. I just can’t wait for his next disc, Bruckner 9th, which has been released locally in Japan.

12 comments:

  1. i'm glad to see this review,this one is my 2nd (or maybe third) choice of the work.

    i'm totally confused with Philipe Herreweghe's recording,and i hope you can write a review about it. I just cann't understand. Although i don't like this no.7,i hope i could find his no.5...(the CD seller in Tw is too lazy to import this recording...)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Eaquson,

    I'm really happy that you also like this CD.
    May I ask what is your 1st and 2nd or 3rd choice of this symphony?

    I'll try to do the reviews on Herreweghe's B7 and B5, but I'm afraid they won't be available till October as I'm really very busy recently.

    Regards,

    Horace

    ReplyDelete
  3. my 1st is Bohm's 1977 live performance issued by Audite. my 2nd(or 3rd) is Frankly Worse Than Most's 7th with LPO. i'm not quite sure about the later. i just love his approach. to me,it's a furtwangler-like approach,but much better than furtwangler's '49 or '50 recordings with BPO.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bohm's B7 on Audite is excellent.

    Although his interpretation is similar to his VPO recording's at DG, it has more sense of occasion as a live concert, with freer phrasing.

    It's funny that you have such a nickname for Franz Welser-Most. I remember his B7 disc quite well as it was his first Bruckner recording. The reading was quite "revolutionary" at that time. It was to his tribute that he could mould such sweet sounds from the upper strings and woodwinds from LPO. However, the portamento is a bit too much for my liking. The first movement's atmosphere feels like Bruno Walter's Columbia SO or Kurt Sanderlings'. His tempo in the second theme of the Adagio was a little too fast. Again it is just personal taste. However, on the whole, it was a much heart-felt reading with an inner pulse full of tension and force.

    ReplyDelete
  5. do u have anyone of Heinz Rogner's bruckner?
    his no.4&7 is impressive,but the sound of both recordings issued by BerlinClassics is really
    not satisfying...i'm wondering that other brands would be better: King,Eterna...

    ReplyDelete
  6. I only have the Berlin Classics versions of Rogner's B5 and B8. At that time I bought only these 2 as B5&8 are my preferences. I didn't bought his other Bruckner recordings as I didn't think they were worthwhile at that time.
    His reading has a good forward momentum, but sometimes I feel it is a little hard-driven. This characteristic is good for B5 in the sense that it can build up the necessary momentum in the first 3 movements for the final climax in the finale. But the downside is that his reading seems a litte "breathless" as the necessary pauses in Bruckner are not well observed.
    His scherzi are animated and full of verve.
    The sound in fact is OK for me, apart from some dullness which I think should be due to the NO-NOISE system employed. Even Philips used this system many years ago but discarded it later for good reasons. I'll elaborate on that later when I have time to make a new post.
    Thank you for mentioning Rogner as it can open up a whole new interesting area for posting.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Everytime i read your response,i always feel amusing and think about your words.It's really a precious experience.

    What u said about rogner makes me think of some conductors with specific sound:Kurt Sanderling,Lorin Mazzel,Welser-Most...and i think Heinz Rogner is one of them.

    The reason why i mention about the sound quality of Heinz Rogner's CDs is that i'm so fond of his brahms symphony set (Weitblick).the sound is nearly perfect(to me),the ressonance of the hall and the interaction of the strings make his "fast" interpretations much more acceptable.
    in fact,if it is a historical recording with bad sound quality,i would never like such performance
    .

    (However,some note on the score will never be presented under such speed..)

    I listen to his no.7 today.to be honest,i do not quite like it.but i still feel he has something to say,and,which is always the case,his intentions may not be fulfilled if the sound is bad...

    You've mentioned about the forward momentum,and this make me think of bohm's bruckner no.8 recorded at his later years(Palexa). He choose a very fast tempo, but he did ont press the orchestra as Rogner did,in fact it is rather light at some forte note. I doubt that Heinz Rogner just want to make the audience feel "uncomfortable",and press the orchestra so hard at moments of crescendos.However,it's the first time i feel something special about sym no.7 when listen to his performance.

    My English is so poor,thanks for reading it patiently.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dear Eaquson,

    Thank you very much for your kind words, and please don't think your English is not OK. I can understand your English easily. In fact the one to apologize should be me, as my mother tongue is Chinese, but I can't master the Chinese input.

    You have a great insight in classical music and I've learned a lot from you. I don't have the Rogner Brahms set although I like Brahms symphonies very much as well. I think I'll go and buy them because of your recommendation.

    Music travels to our ears (and eventually to our soul) through the medium of sound. So sound quality in a recording is very very important.
    I was listening to the mono recordings of Tchaikovsky 5th and 6th by Mravinsky (DG) last night, and they were so vivid and impressive. The last time I listened to them was many years ago already, and it showed the magic of a good recording -- it can give you a tug at the heartstrings every time you get in touch with it again, like reunion with an old friend. I can't help thinking what it would be like if Toscanini's 1930s recordings can be heard in good sound.

    As for Bohm's B8 with Zurich Tonhalle Orchestra, I've always thought that it is an once-in-a-life-time alchemy at work. A truly great Brucknerian moulding a provincial orchestra to give us a magical moment. This recording will cast off any doubt people have about Bohm being not a great conductor but a mere Kapellmeister.

    Best regards,

    Horace

    ReplyDelete
  9. i come to tell u that i just bought this old cd of Heinz Rogner's B8 with Rundfunk-Sinfonie-Orchestra Berlin(issued at 1986),and the sound is as good as weitblick's brahms set.
    This makes me feel both happy and sad.

    For one thing,it seems that the sound of the recorded "tapes"(or whatsoever) of RSO Berlin are just excellent(judged by many recordings of this orchestra issued by Weitblick,and this particular one).So maybe Weitblick may issue other bruckner recordings of Heinz Rogner.

    For another,the copyright seems to be owned by BC,and the sound of their recording is not satisfying.

    I never feel uncomfortable when i listen to this B8.Yes,it is breathless,but this is the way he did music and his sound is really amusing that i think it is a rather soft (and rational)interpretation.

    Judging by the B7 of Berlin Classics,i think his bruckner is a little hysteric.

    There are really some problems with BC's recordings,and this may cause many misunderstandings of Heinz Rogner's art.

    ReplyDelete
  10. i forget the picture.the link are :
    goods.ruten.com.tw/item/show?11090909938964

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks for the info and comments.

    I need to investigate a little on the copyright problems as some of these recordings were made in the former East Germany, and it could become quite complicated after the reunification of Germany.

    Speaking of Deutsche Schallplatten, I have Otmar Suitner's B5 on this label as well as on Berlin Classics. Yes the sound on the former is superior. I still think that it is the problem of the NO_NOISE system employed by Berlin Classics. By minimizing tape hiss, it must have cut out harmonics and partials above the fundamental frequency and also some lower frequencies, thus affecting the "ambience" and "air" of the recorded sound. It became duller and the upper strings sometimes appear so thin and shrieking. Hence I agree that the sound on Berlin Classics did no justice to Rogner's art in a sense, but after all there are elements in the music making that will not be affected by the quality of the sound, e.g. tempo, phrasing, rhythm and shaping of a melodic line.

    BTW the HK importer of Weitblick has never imported Rogner's Brahms set -- this is the answer when I asked them. I think I need to look elsewhere to obtain this set.

    ReplyDelete
  12. in my opinion,worse than most's first B7 with LPO is not successful.though he built a sence of unity in 1st and 2nd movment,it is a little over exaggerated. A broadcast file with Cleveland which i found on Internet is much better(13 October 2003,not the same concert of the Euroarts dvd),with the slightly rubato which is his trademark in his previous B5 recording with LPO.

    i like sanderling's B7 as well, but i have only listened the performance on abruckner.com. it's odd that the sound is very similiar with his other recordings,especially that of the strings.

    BTW,Haitink's 8th with skd is strongly recomended by my friend on Plurk Willynn,who is a Haitink fan and go to his concerts with CSO often. Wish i can find it in TW soon >_<.

    it's nice to see "An enlivening path to retread" series,which shows a taste of special interests.
    the recordings of Karel Šejna,as well as many of Matacic,seems to be out of print and only Japan edition are available?

    some said that the sound of Supraphone Japan are not satisfying,my experince with Ancerl's several recordings is also not good?

    ReplyDelete